{"id":745,"date":"2014-03-15T10:01:05","date_gmt":"2014-03-15T10:01:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/?p=745"},"modified":"2016-12-09T05:15:17","modified_gmt":"2016-12-09T05:15:17","slug":"633-honeycomb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/2014\/03\/15\/633-honeycomb\/","title":{"rendered":"{6,3,3} Honeycomb"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">\n<div id=\"attachment_746\" style=\"width: 1034px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2014\/03\/633_honeycomb_roice.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-746\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2014\/03\/633_honeycomb_roice.png\" alt=\"{6,3,3} Honeycomb - Roice Nelson\" width=\"1024\" height=\"768\" class=\"size-full wp-image-746\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2014\/03\/633_honeycomb_roice.png 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2014\/03\/633_honeycomb_roice-300x225.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-746\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">{6,3,3} Honeycomb &#8211; Roice Nelson<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>This is the {6,3,3} honeycomb, drawn by <a href=\"http:\/\/roice3.blogspot.sg\/\">Roice Nelson<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A 3-dimensional <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Honeycomb_%28geometry%29\">honeycomb<\/a> is a way of filling 3d space with polyhedra. It&#8217;s the 3-dimensional analogue of a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tessellation\">tiling<\/a> of the plane.  Besides honeycombs in 3d Euclidean space, we can also have honeycombs in 3d <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hyperbolic_space\">hyperbolic space<\/a>, a non-Euclidean geometry with constant negative curvature. The {6,3,3} honeycomb lives in hyperbolic space.   For another view of it, also by Roice Nelson, see:<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/2013\/09\/15\/633-honeycomb-in-upper-half-space\/\">{6,3,3} honeycomb in upper half space<\/a>, <i>Visual Insight<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>When I said a honeycomb is a way of filling 3d space with polyhedra, I was lying slightly.  The {6,3,3} honeycomb is also called the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hexagonal_tiling_honeycomb\"><b>hexagonal tiling honeycomb<\/b><\/a>.  The reason is that it contains many sheets of hexagons, tiling planes in the usual way hexagons do.  These are flat Euclidean planes lying in 3d hyperbolic space, called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/journals\/bull\/1926-32-05\/S0002-9904-1926-04257-9\/S0002-9904-1926-04257-9.pdf\">horospheres<\/a>.  The sheets of hexagons are not exactly polyhedra, because they have <i>infinitely many<\/i> polygonal faces!  So, the {6,3,3} honeycomb is an example of a &#8216;paracompact&#8217; honeycomb.<\/p>\n<p>The notation {6,3,3} is an example of a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Schl%C3%A4fli_symbol\">Schl\u00e4fli symbol<\/a>. The Schl\u00e4fli symbol is defined in a recursive way. The symbol for the hexagon is {6}. The symbol for the hexagonal tiling of the plane is {6,3} because 3 hexagons meet at each vertex.  Finally, the hexagonal tiling honeycomb has symbol {6,3,3} because 3 hexagonal tilings meet at each edge.<\/p>\n<p>Just as the {6,3} inside {6,3,3} describes the hexagonal tilings inside the {6,3,3} honeycomb, the {3,3} describes the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Vertex_figure\">vertex figure<\/a> of this honeycomb: that is, the way the edges meet at each vertex.  {3,3} is the Schl\u00e4fli symbol for the regular tetrahedron, and if you look at the picture you can can see that each vertex has 4 edges coming out, just like the edges going from the center of a tetrahedron to its corners.<\/p>\n<p>The hexagonal tiling honeycomb is an example of a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Uniform_honeycombs_in_hyperbolic_space\">uniform honeycomb in 3d hyperbolic space<\/a>.  It is called <b>regular<\/b> because it is especially symmetrical: its symmetry group acts transitively on the set of flags, where a <b>flag<\/b> is a vertex lying on an edge lying on a face lying on cell (in this case, a sheet of hexagons).   <\/p>\n<p>As already mentioned, the hexagonal tiling honeycomb is called <b>paracompact<\/b> because it has infinite cells, which in this case are the hexagonal tilings {6,3}.  There are 15 regular honeycombs in 3d hyperbolic space, of which 11 are paracompact.  For more, see:<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paracompact_uniform_honeycombs\">Paracompact uniform honeycomb<\/a>, Wikipedia.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Coxeter%E2%80%93Dynkin_diagram#Application_with_uniform_polytopes\">Coxeter diagram<\/a> of the {6,3,3} honeycomb is<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<b>&#9679;&#8212;6&#8212;o&#8212;3&#8212;o&#8212;3&#8212;o<\/b>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>The symmetry group of the {6,3,3} honeycomb is a discrete subgroup of the symmetry group of hyperbolic space.  This discrete group has generators and relations summarized by the unmarked Coxeter diagram:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<b>o&#8212;6&#8212;o&#8212;3&#8212;o&#8212;3&#8212;o<\/b>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This diagram says there are four generators $s_1, \\dots, s_4$ obeying relations encoded in the edges of the diagram:<\/p>\n<p>$$  (s_1 s_2)^6 = 1 $$<br \/>\n$$  (s_2 s_3)^3 = 1 $$<br \/>\n$$  (s_3 s_4)^3 = 1 $$<\/p>\n<p>together with relations <\/p>\n<p>$$s_i^2 = 1$$<\/p>\n<p>and <\/p>\n<p>$$  s_i s_j = s_j s_i \\; \\textrm{ if } \\; |i &#8211; j| &gt; 1 $$<\/p>\n<p>Marking the Coxeter diagram in different ways lets us describe many honeycombs with the same symmetry group as the hexagonal tiling honeycomb&#8212;in fact, $2^4 &#8211; 1 = 15$ of them, since there are 4 dots in the Coxeter diagram!  You can see some of these uniform honeycombs here:<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hexagonal_tiling_honeycomb\">Hexagonal tiling honeycomb<\/a>, Wikipedia.<\/p>\n<p><b>Puzzle:<\/b> The symmetry group of 3d hyperbolic space, not counting reflections, is $\\mathrm{PSL}(2,\\mathbb{C})$.  Can you explicitly describe the subgroup that preserves the hexagonal tiling honeycomb?  <\/p>\n<p>Roice Nelson, the creator of this image, is a software developer with a passion for exploring mathematics through visualization:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"http:\/\/roice3.org\/\">Roice<\/a>.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Martin Weissman answered the puzzle <a href=\"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/u\/0\/117663015413546257905\/posts\/j4oywo9nMWz\" rel=\"nofollow\">on G+<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> Well, it&#8217;s $\\mathrm{PSL}_2(\\mathbb{Z}[e^{2 \\pi i \/ 3}])$, of course!  :)\ufeff\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Since he&#8217;s an expert on arithmetic Coxeter groups, this must be about right!  Theorem 10.2 here:<\/p>\n<p>&bull; Norman W. Johnson and Asia Ivic Weiss, <a href=\"https:\/\/cms.math.ca\/cjm\/v51\/weisscox8.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">Quadratic Integers and Coxeter Groups<\/a>, <i>Canad. J. Math. Vol.<\/i> <b>51<\/b> (1999), 1307\u20131336.<\/p>\n<p>is a bit more precise.  It gives a nice description of the <b>even part<\/b> of the Coxeter group discussed in this article, that is, the part generated by <i>products of pairs<\/i> of reflections.   To get this group, we start with 2 &times; 2 matrices with entries in the <b><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eisenstein_integer\">Eisenstein integers<\/a><\/b>: the integers with a cube root of -1 adjoined.  We look at the matrices where the <i>absolute value<\/i> of the determinant is 1, and then we &#8216;projectivize&#8217; it, modding out by its center.  That does the job!<\/p>\n<p>They call the even part of the Coxeter group $[3,3,6]^+$, and they call the group it&#8217;s isomorphic to  $\\mathrm{P\\overline{S}L}_2(\\mathbb{E}])$, where $\\mathbb{E}$ is their notation for the Eisenstein integers, also called $\\mathbb{Z}[e^{2 \\pi i \/ 3}]$.  The funny little line over the <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0&#038;c=20201002\" alt=\"S\" class=\"latex\" \/> is a notation of theirs: $\\mathrm{SL}_2$ stands for 2 &times; 2 matrices with determinant 1, but $\\mathrm{\\overline{S}L}_2$ is their notation for 2 &times; 2 matrices whose determinant has absolute value 1.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><i>Visual Insight<\/i> is a place to share striking images that help explain advanced topics in mathematics. I\u2019m always looking for truly beautiful images, so if you know about one, please drop a comment <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/about-visual-insight\/\">here<\/a> and let me know!<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is the {6,3,3} honeycomb, drawn by <a href=\"http:\/\/roice3.blogspot.sg\/\">Roice Nelson<\/a>.  A 3-dimensional <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Honeycomb_%28geometry%29\">honeycomb<\/a> is a way of filling 3d space with polyhedra. It&#8217;s the 3-dimensional analogue of a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tessellation\">tiling<\/a> of the plane.  Besides honeycombs in 3d Euclidean space, we can also have honeycombs in 3d <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hyperbolic_space\">hyperbolic space<\/a>.  The hexagonal tiling honeycomb lives in hyperbolic space, and each vertex has 4 edges coming out, just as if we drew edges from the middle of a tetrahedron to its 4 corners.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" data-url=https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/2014\/03\/15\/633-honeycomb\/><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":66,"featured_media":746,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-honeycombs","category-images-library"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2014\/03\/633_honeycomb_roice.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p42Vmc-c1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/66"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=745"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/745\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2977,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/745\/revisions\/2977"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/746"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}