{"id":1611,"date":"2015-05-15T01:00:12","date_gmt":"2015-05-15T01:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/?p=1611"},"modified":"2017-05-07T08:04:04","modified_gmt":"2017-05-07T08:04:04","slug":"dodecahedron-with-5-tetrahedra","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/2015\/05\/15\/dodecahedron-with-5-tetrahedra\/","title":{"rendered":"Dodecahedron With 5 Tetrahedra"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">\n<div id=\"attachment_1613\" style=\"width: 356px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/dodecahedron_with_5_tetrahedra.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1613\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/dodecahedron_with_5_tetrahedra.gif\" alt=\"Dodecahedron With 5 Tetrahedra - Greg Egan\" width=\"350\" height=\"350\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1613\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1613\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Dodecahedron With 5 Tetrahedra &#8211; Greg Egan<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>This image by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gregegan.net\">Greg Egan<\/a> shows 5 ways to inscribe a regular tetrahedron in a regular dodecahedron.  More precisely, it shows 5 ways to choose 4 vertices of the dodecahedron that are also vertices of a regular tetrahedron.<\/p>\n<p>The union of all these tetrahedra is a nonconvex polyhedron called the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Compound_of_five_tetrahedra\"><b>compound of 5 tetrahedra<\/b><\/a>, first described by Edmund Hess in 1876.<\/p>\n<p>This polyhedron is <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Chirality_%28mathematics%29\"><b>chiral<\/b><\/a>: it has no reflection symmetries.  In rough terms, it has an inherent &#8216;left-handedness&#8217;: if you start at a point where the 5 tetrahedra meet, you&#8217;ll see the lines of intersection &#8216;swirl counterclockwise&#8217; as they go out.  <\/p>\n<p>In fact there are 10 ways to inscribe a regular tetrahedron in a regular dodecahedron.  5 form the left-handed polyhedron above, and the other 5 give the right-handed version of this polyhedron.  The union of all 10 tetrahedra is a polytope called <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Compound_of_ten_tetrahedra\"><b>compound of 10 tetrahedra<\/b><\/a>, which has reflection symmetries:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<div id=\"attachment_1614\" style=\"width: 356px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/dodecahedron_with_10_tetrahedra.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1614\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/dodecahedron_with_10_tetrahedra.gif\" alt=\"Dodecahedron With 10 Tetrahedra - Greg Egan\" width=\"350\" height=\"350\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1614\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1614\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Dodecahedron With 10 Tetrahedra &#8211; Greg Egan<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The two kinds of tetrahedra are colored yellow and cyan.  Regions belonging to both are colored magenta.  It&#8217;s pretty&#8212;but it&#8217;s hard to see the individual tetrahedra, because they overlap a lot.<\/p>\n<p>We can do something similar starting with a cube:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<div id=\"attachment_1612\" style=\"width: 356px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/cube_with_2_tetrahedra.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1612\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/cube_with_2_tetrahedra.gif\" alt=\"Cube With 2 Tetrahedra - Greg Egan\" width=\"350\" height=\"350\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1612\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1612\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Cube With 2 Tetrahedra &#8211; Greg Egan<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>There are 2 ways to inscribe a regular tetrahedron in a cube.  Taken together they form a nonconvex polyhedron called the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stellated_octahedron\"><b>stellated octahedron<\/b><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>There are 5 ways to inscribe a cube in a dodecahedron.  Their union is called the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Compound_of_five_cubes\"><b>compound of 5 cubes<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<div id=\"attachment_1615\" style=\"width: 356px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/dodecahedron_with_5_cubes.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1615\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/dodecahedron_with_5_cubes.gif\" alt=\"Dodecahedron With 5 Cubes - Greg Egan\" width=\"350\" height=\"350\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1615\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1615\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Dodecahedron With 5 Cubes &#8211; Greg Egan<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Inscribing 2 tetrahedra in each of these cubes, we obtain the 10 tetrahedra in the dodecahedron.<\/p>\n<p>What is the mathematics underlying these relationships between the tetrahedron, cube and dodecahedron?  The finite subgroups of the rotation group $\\mathrm{SO}(3)$ can be classified, up to conjugation:<\/p>\n<p>&bull; for each $n \\ge 1$, the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cyclic_group\">cyclic group<\/a> $\\mathbb{Z}\/n$,<\/p>\n<p>&bull; for each $n \\ge 2$, the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dihedral_group\">dihedral group<\/a> $\\mathrm{D}_n$,<\/p>\n<p>&bull; the rotational symmetry group of the tetrahedron, which is isomorphic to the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Alternating_group\">alternating group<\/a> $\\mathrm{A}_4$, the group of even permutations of the tetrahedron&#8217;s 4 vertices.<\/p>\n<p>&bull; the rotational symmetry group of the cube, which is isomorphic to the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Symmetric_group\">symmetric group<\/a> $\\mathrm{S}_4$, the group of permutations of the cube&#8217;s 4 diagonal axes.  <\/p>\n<p>&bull; the rotational symmetry group of the dodecahedron, which is isomorphic to the symmetric group $\\mathrm{A}_5$, the group of even permutations of the 5 cubes inscribed in the dodecahedron.<\/p>\n<p>So, what&#8217;s at work here is a relation between $\\mathrm{A}_4, \\mathrm{S}_4$ and $\\mathrm{A}_5$, both as abstract groups and as subgroups of $\\mathrm{SO}(3)$.<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <b>Tetrahedron and cube.<\/b> $\\mathrm{A}_4$ is a subgroup of $\\mathrm{S}_4$.  So, every symmetry of an inscribed tetrahedron gives a symmetry of the cube.  Since $\\mathrm{A}_4$ is a subgroup of $\\mathrm{S}_4$ <i>in a unique way<\/i>, both tetrahedra in the cube have <i>the same<\/i> subgroup of $\\mathrm{S}_4$ as symmetries&#8212;not merely <i>conjugate<\/i> subgroups.<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <b>Tetrahedron and dodecahedron.<\/b> $\\mathrm{A}_4$ is a subgroup of $\\mathrm{A}_5$.  So, every symmetry of an inscribed tetrahedron gives a symmetry of the dodecahedron.  $\\mathrm{A}_4$ is a subgroup of $\\mathrm{A}_5$ in 5 different ways that are all conjugate.  For each of these 5 subgroups, 2 of the 10 tetrahedra in the dodecahedron have this subgroup as symmetries.<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <b>Cube and dodecahedron.<\/b>  $\\mathrm{S}_4$ is not a subgroup of $\\mathrm{A}_5$.  So, not every symmetry of an inscribed cube gives a symmetry of the dodecahedron.  <\/p>\n<p><b>Puzzle 1:<\/b> Describe a tetrahedron in a cube, tetrahedron in a dodecahedron or cube in a dodecahedron using the language of group theory.   Use this to explain why there are 2 tetrahedra in the cube, 10 tetrahedra in the dodecahedron and 5 cubes in the dodecahedron.<\/p>\n<p><b>Puzzle 2:<\/b> $\\mathrm{A}_4$ is a normal subgroup of $\\mathrm{S}_4$ but not of $\\mathrm{A}_5$.  How does this make tetrahedra in the cube different than tetrahedra in the dodecahedron?<\/p>\n<p>For more, see:<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <a href=\"http:\/\/groupprops.subwiki.org\/wiki\/Alternating_group:A4\">Alternating group $\\mathrm{A}_4$<\/a>, <i>Groupprops<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <a href=\"http:\/\/groupprops.subwiki.org\/wiki\/Symmetric_group:S4\">Symmetric group $\\mathrm{S}_4$<\/a>, <i>Groupprops<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <a href=\"http:\/\/groupprops.subwiki.org\/wiki\/Alternating_group:A5\">Alternating group $\\mathrm{A}_5$<\/a>, <i>Groupprops<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>&bull; <a href=\"http:\/\/groupprops.subwiki.org\/wiki\/Classification_of_finite_subgroups_of_SO%283,R%29\">Classification of finite subgroups of $\\mathrm{SO}(3)$<\/a>, <i>Groupprops<\/i>.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><i>Visual Insight<\/i> is a place to share striking images that help explain advanced topics in mathematics. I\u2019m always looking for truly beautiful images, so if you know about one, please drop a comment <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/about-visual-insight\/\">here<\/a> and let me know!<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This image by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gregegan.net\">Greg Egan<\/a> shows 5 ways to inscribe a regular tetrahedron in a regular dodecahedron.   The union of all these is a nonconvex polyhedron called the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Compound_of_five_tetrahedra\">compound of 5 tetrahedra<\/a>, first described by Edmund Hess in 1876.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" data-url=https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/2015\/05\/15\/dodecahedron-with-5-tetrahedra\/><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":66,"featured_media":1613,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-images-library","category-polytopes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/files\/2015\/05\/dodecahedron_with_5_tetrahedra.gif","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p42Vmc-pZ","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/66"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1611"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1611\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3034,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1611\/revisions\/3034"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1613"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/visualinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}