{"id":2945,"date":"2012-04-14T01:36:53","date_gmt":"2012-04-14T05:36:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mathgradblog.williams.edu\/?p=2945"},"modified":"2012-04-14T01:36:53","modified_gmt":"2012-04-14T05:36:53","slug":"scientific-publishing-link-roundup","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/2012\/04\/14\/scientific-publishing-link-roundup\/","title":{"rendered":"Scientific Publishing Link Roundup"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-3026\" title=\"ELSEVIER\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/files\/2012\/04\/logo_ELSEVIER-282x300.jpg\" alt=\"ELSEVIER\" width=\"282\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/files\/2012\/04\/logo_ELSEVIER-282x300.jpg 282w, https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/files\/2012\/04\/logo_ELSEVIER.jpg 363w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 282px) 100vw, 282px\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/mathgradblog.williams.edu\/cost-knowledge-learned-ongoing-elsevier-boycott\/\">My colleague covered<\/a> the particular airing of grievances following <a href=\"http:\/\/gowers.wordpress.com\/2012\/01\/21\/elsevier-my-part-in-its-downfall\/\">Timothy Gowers&#8217; blog post in January<\/a>. As a graduate student still working to finish up course requirements, I think about the publishing process sort of how I think about taxes. I know there&#8217;s a very real deadline, after which I will have to deal with all the pains of this aspect of my career. But for now it all seems a wee bit ethereal. However, I found the nature of the discussion of this story, spread quickly across the internet, incredibly engaging. The stage was set within two days of Professor Gowers&#8217; blog post, when David Clark, an employee of Elsevier, <a href=\"http:\/\/gowers.wordpress.com\/2012\/01\/21\/elsevier-my-part-in-its-downfall\/#comment-14679\">directly addressed the issue in the comments section<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>If you click through to this <a href=\"http:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/polymath1\/index.php?title=Journal_publishing_reform\">inventory of writing about the boycott<\/a>, you&#8217;ll see that the responses have taken extremely diverse forms. It&#8217;s exciting, even if you don&#8217;t participate, to have the ability to sift through conversations about both the mathematical and &#8220;administrative&#8221; thoughts of leaders in the field. There are also more traditional forums, such as this upcoming <a href=\"http:\/\/sbseminar.wordpress.com\/2012\/04\/08\/mathematicians-take-a-stand\/\">article to appear in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society<\/a> which lays out the arguments against bundling and other policies of Elsevier. The March issue of the Notices contains a practical counterpoint titled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/notices\/201203\/rtx120300436p.pdf\">Do Mathematicians Get the Author Rights They Want?<\/a> It provides a handy comparison of various standard publishing agreements you must sign in order to have a paper published.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to critiques of the current system, there have been attempts at describing new forms of mathematical and scientific publishing; <a href=\"http:\/\/mathoverflow.net\/\">MathOverflow<\/a> has shown the power of improving social connectedness via the internet.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My colleague covered the particular airing of grievances following Timothy Gowers&#8217; blog post in January. As a graduate student still working to finish up course requirements, I think about the publishing process sort of how I think about taxes. I &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/2012\/04\/14\/scientific-publishing-link-roundup\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" data-url=https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/2012\/04\/14\/scientific-publishing-link-roundup\/><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3gbww-Lv","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/mathgradblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}