{"id":981,"date":"2015-02-19T08:00:11","date_gmt":"2015-02-19T14:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/?p=981"},"modified":"2015-02-19T02:15:02","modified_gmt":"2015-02-19T08:15:02","slug":"the-social-side-of-mathematics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2015\/02\/19\/the-social-side-of-mathematics\/","title":{"rendered":"The Social Side of Mathematics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Samantha Oestreicher is a recent Ph.D. in applied mathematics. She&#8217;s been blogging about <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/\">social mathematics<\/a> since 2007, but I only discovered her blog in December when she started a series of posts about <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2014\/12\/24\/tap-dancing-mathematics\/\">math and tap dancing<\/a>. She describes a rhythm game she used to play in tap class in <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2014\/12\/31\/mathgamesintapclass\/\">terms of modular arithmetic<\/a>, and in a later post, she <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2015\/01\/21\/how-tap-dancing-is-like-climate-change\/\">connects tap to her climate science research<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_982\" style=\"width: 522px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Iowatapdancers.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-982\" class=\"size-full wp-image-982\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2015\/02\/Iowatapdancers.jpg?resize=512%2C391\" alt=\"A tap dancing class, perhaps about to embark on a lesson about modular arithmetic.\" width=\"512\" height=\"391\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2015\/02\/Iowatapdancers.jpg?w=512&amp;ssl=1 512w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2015\/02\/Iowatapdancers.jpg?resize=300%2C229&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-982\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A tap dancing class, perhaps about to embark on a lesson about modular arithmetic or climate cycles.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Oestreicher <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/about\/\">says she hated math in high school<\/a> but eventually decided that she was just going along with the crowd. Her undergraduate degree was in theater, and she spent some time in grad school working as the coordinating director of Math Thespian Presentations at the University of Minnesota. I think the combination of a math-averse past and her experience in the arts\u00a0give her a perspective not seen on many math blogs.<\/p>\n<p>Oestreicher recommends the <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/category\/elegance-series\/\">Elegance Series<\/a> to new blog readers. Unsurprisingly, it\u2019s about elegance in mathematical proofs. What is it? Why do we like it? Where does it come from? Many other mathematicians have written about this topic, of course, but I thought she had some interesting things to add. In one post, <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2007\/08\/01\/elegance-not-just-for-fashion\/\">she compares mathematical elegance to elegance in fashion<\/a>. \u201cElegance is a social construct, an adjective to describe a simple, well designed, full-package beauty.\u201d She asks, \u201cIs social elegance reserved for the rich? Is mathematical elegance reserved for the mathematically advanced?\u201d As my answer to the question of whether math is only for &#8220;math people&#8221; (of course not!) has been one of my <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scientificamerican.com\/roots-of-unity\/2015\/02\/05\/the-media-and-the-genius-myth\/\">hobby horses<\/a> lately, I was interested in the connection she made between that idea and the idea of elegance.<\/p>\n<p>Browsing through the archives, I also came across some posts about <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/category\/proof-series\/\">proofs<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/category\/belief-in-math\/\">belief<\/a>,\u00a0and <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/category\/communicating-math\/\">communicating mathematics<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2008\/12\/05\/leaving-up-the-scaffolding\/\">One post<\/a> in the proof series offered an unusual perspective about the opaque proofs we read in journal articles.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I used to think bitter thoughts about some author\u2019s proofs. Then my real analysis professor said something fascinating.\u00a0 I think he may have been quoting someone else (any one out there know who he was quoting?).\u00a0 A masterpiece of architecture would never be opened to the public with it\u2019s scaffolding still up.\u00a0 You are to see the final product and wonder at it\u2019s beauty as apposed to analyzing how it was built.\u00a0 For the same reason mathematicians remove the scaffolding from their proofs once they are complete.\u00a0 They do the final finish work and publish incomprehensible and beautiful proofs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Because mathematical proof is about communication and context (the proof may change drastically based on the audience), I don&#8217;t think I agree fully. I think authors should leave more\u00a0of the scaffolding up for readers.\u00a0But sometimes it&#8217;s not clear what is scaffolding and what is the building. A\u00a0related issue, the right way to talk about math with non-mathematicians, appears in a post about &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2011\/09\/05\/speaking-math\/\">Speaking Math<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>With over 7 years of archives, there are quite a few other series and freestanding posts about <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2010\/01\/29\/jmm_2010\/\">mathematicians<\/a> (both social and antisocial) and the mathematics hidden\u00a0in everyday life, including <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2009\/07\/10\/is-sudoku-math\/\">Sudoku<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2008\/04\/26\/math-in-video-games\/\">video games<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/2011\/12\/03\/balancing-rigor-and-whimsy\/\">art<\/a>. As Oestereich&#8217;s research is related to climate science, there is also an\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/socialmathematics.net\/category\/ecomathematics\/\">EcoMathematics<\/a>\u00a0category. I&#8217;m looking forward to reading more.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Samantha Oestreicher is a recent Ph.D. in applied mathematics. She&#8217;s been blogging about social mathematics since 2007, but I only discovered her blog in December when she started a series of posts about math and tap dancing. She describes a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2015\/02\/19\/the-social-side-of-mathematics\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" data-url=https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2015\/02\/19\/the-social-side-of-mathematics\/><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":982,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,86],"tags":[263,371,370],"class_list":["post-981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-applied-math","category-people-in-math","tag-math-and-dance","tag-mathematics-and-the-arts","tag-samantha-oestreicher"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2015\/02\/Iowatapdancers.jpg?fit=512%2C391&ssl=1","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3tW3N-fP","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=981"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/981\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":986,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/981\/revisions\/986"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/982"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}