{"id":832,"date":"2014-11-12T08:00:34","date_gmt":"2014-11-12T14:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/?p=832"},"modified":"2014-11-12T14:39:42","modified_gmt":"2014-11-12T20:39:42","slug":"complicated-math-in-simple-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2014\/11\/12\/complicated-math-in-simple-words\/","title":{"rendered":"Simple Words, Complicated Math"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_833\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/xkcd.com\/1133\/\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-833\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-833\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2014\/11\/up_goer_five-e1415776731362-300x189.png?resize=300%2C189\" alt=\"Part of the up-goer five. Image: Randall Munroe, xkcd.com. Click for full comic.\" width=\"300\" height=\"189\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2014\/11\/up_goer_five-e1415776731362.png?resize=300%2C189&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2014\/11\/up_goer_five-e1415776731362.png?w=739&amp;ssl=1 739w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-833\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Part of the up-goer five. Image: Randall Munroe, xkcd.com. Click for full comic.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A couple years ago, <a href=\"http:\/\/xkcd.com\/1133\/\">xkcd<\/a> described the Saturn V rocket (Up Goer 5) using only the <del>thousand<\/del> ten hundred most common English words. Of course, xkcd readers were eager to try it\u00a0themselves, and geneticist Theo Sanderson created an <a href=\"http:\/\/splasho.com\/upgoer5\/\">online text editor<\/a>\u00a0for it. Thus <a href=\"http:\/\/tenhundredwordsofscience.tumblr.com\/\">tenhundredwordsofscience<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/upgoeryourphd.tumblr.com\/\">upgoeryourphd<\/a> were born. Both sites feature attempts by people from all sorts of branches of science to describe their work using only those thousand words.<\/p>\n<p>Last month, <a href=\"https:\/\/golem.ph.utexas.edu\/category\/2014\/10\/maths_just_in_short_words.html\">David Roberts posted a proof<\/a> of multiple cardinalities of infinity using only one-syllable words to the <a href=\"https:\/\/golem.ph.utexas.edu\/category\/\">n-Category Caf\u00e9<\/a>. Like the up-goer five challenge, the one-syllable exercise is part <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Oulipo\">Oulipo<\/a> and part math\/science communication. The\u00a0requirements are strictly enforced, leading to circumlocutions that would be clearer with a little more flexibility. (\u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/tenhundredwordsofscience.tumblr.com\/\">The small round thing that passes through the sky every night as it moves around us<\/a>\u201d is not clearer than \u201cmoon,\u201d but \u201cmoon\u201d is 1809 on the list of most common words, so it doesn\u2019t pass the up-goer 5 test.) You can get away with a little more with the one-syllable challenge, but it&#8217;s still tough.<\/p>\n<p>The comments on the post and the related <a href=\"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/+DavidRoberts\/posts\/U4VFj6KZt5P\">Google+ post<\/a> have some good\u00a0examples of mathematics written in one-syllable words or with other constraints: cartoon proofs, proofs in verse, proofs without the letter &#8216;e,&#8217;\u00a0and so on. I am also reminded of the\u00a0(sadly dormant) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ProofinaTweet\">@ProofinaTweet<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/tinyproof\">@TinyProof<\/a> Twitter accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The constraints are fun to play with, and they&#8217;ve\u00a0helped me think about the difference between using simple or short words and actually making a concept easier to understand. The <a href=\"http:\/\/simple.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Main_Page\">Simple English Wikipedia<\/a> is designed to have articles that are more accessible to children and adults who are learning English than the regular English Wikipedia articles are. There are <a href=\"http:\/\/simple.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:How_to_write_Simple_English_pages\">guidelines<\/a>, not rules, that help authors make their ideas easier for English learners. Authors are encouraged to use the 850 words on the <a href=\"http:\/\/simple.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Basic_English\">Basic English<\/a> list, but they shouldn\u2019t adhere to that limitation if doing so results in more confusion. Flexibility is important for clarity.<\/p>\n<p>When writing about math and science, people with technical backgrounds are often encouraged to avoid jargon, and in general, that\u2019s sound advice. But sometimes, it\u2019s better to <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scientificamerican.com\/roots-of-unity\/2014\/10\/31\/higher-homotopy-groups-are-spooky\/\">explain the word homotopy<\/a> and then use it in an article than to say \u201cdeformation of one thing into another thing without cutting it\u201d twelve times. (By the way, that&#8217;s the Simple English Wikipedia explanation of homotopy, and it&#8217;s pretty good, isn&#8217;t it?) Jargon has a place not only in communication between experts in the same field but also in popular science writing. But it is a hurdle for readers, and I think it\u2019s a good idea to approach it with caution. The up-goer five and one-syllable challenges feel like extreme versions of a no-jargon challenge. (OK, maybe not if you study stacks, sheaves, or schemes.)<\/p>\n<p>After my <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scientificamerican.com\/roots-of-unity\/2014\/10\/31\/higher-homotopy-groups-are-spooky\/\">recent post on higher homotopy groups<\/a>, a jargon diet is probably a good idea. I didn\u2019t participate in the up-goer 5 challenge, but the <del>one-syllable<\/del> just short words math <del>challenge<\/del> task sounds more interesting to me. I haven&#8217;t decided what proof I&#8217;m going to monosyllable-ize yet, but I will be participating. I\u2019m interested to see what other people do with it as well. Feel free to share your contributions in the comments here, at the <a href=\"https:\/\/golem.ph.utexas.edu\/category\/2014\/10\/maths_just_in_short_words.html\">n-category Caf\u00e9<\/a>, or on your own blog.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A couple years ago, xkcd described the Saturn V rocket (Up Goer 5) using only the thousand ten hundred most common English words. Of course, xkcd readers were eager to try it\u00a0themselves, and geneticist Theo Sanderson created an online text &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2014\/11\/12\/complicated-math-in-simple-words\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" data-url=https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2014\/11\/12\/complicated-math-in-simple-words\/><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[284,83,307,308,304,305,306,216],"class_list":["post-832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mathematics-and-the-arts","tag-math-communication","tag-mathematics","tag-monosyllabic-mathematics","tag-n-category-cafe","tag-oulipo","tag-simple-english","tag-up-goer-five","tag-xkcd"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3tW3N-dq","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=832"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/832\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":839,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/832\/revisions\/839"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}