{"id":3726,"date":"2018-08-06T07:00:09","date_gmt":"2018-08-06T11:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/?p=3726"},"modified":"2018-08-06T07:00:13","modified_gmt":"2018-08-06T11:00:13","slug":"what-wish-would-you-ask-a-math-genie-to-grant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2018\/08\/06\/what-wish-would-you-ask-a-math-genie-to-grant\/","title":{"rendered":"What Wish Would You Ask a Math Genie to Grant?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Genie

Credit: Image via Flickr CC Brian Neudorff<\/p><\/div>\n

\u201cIf a genie offered to give you a thorough understanding of one theorem, what theorem would you choose?\u201d blogger John D. Cook<\/a> recently asked<\/a> on his @AnalysisFact<\/a> Twitter account. Responses ranged from the names of theorems to questions about the genie\u2019s potential trickery to creative ways of gaining insights beyond an understanding of one theorem.<\/p>\n

Cook summarized the results on his blog<\/a>. In an interview conducted over email, he answered my questions about his genie idea. (The following interview has been edited for length and clarity.)<\/p>\n

Rachel Crowell: How did you come up with the question? <\/strong><\/p>\n

John D. Cook: I asked two similar questions on Twitter around the same time. One was about what book would you like to have read but don’t want to put in the effort to read. The other was what theorem you’d like to know without having to study. So both are related. I don’t remember which I thought of first.<\/p>\n

RC: I saw your own response to the question: “For a long time I would have said the Atiyah-Singer index theorem. Now maybe I\u2019d say the classification of finite simple groups, especially how ‘the monster’ group relates to unexpected things.” Would you please elaborate on that point?<\/strong><\/p>\n

JDC: As for my earlier interest in the Atiyah-Singer index theorem, I was a grad student at the time, and that theorem seemed to be the culmination of many of the things I’d studied. I thought that if I understood that theorem, I’d put a lot of pieces into place.<\/p>\n

My interests have changed since then. I don’t think about differential equations on manifolds much anymore. Now I think more about probability and statistics.<\/p>\n

I have no professional interest in the classification of finite simple groups. That’s one reason I find it interesting, because it is so unfamiliar. It’s curious that it’s an easy problem to state, starting from scratch, and yet it has taken a tremendous amount of effort. It’s also curious that the sporadic groups have unexpected connections to sphere packing, physics, etc. You have these groups that were the last to be discovered, the odds and ends that don’t fit into the rest of the theorem, and they turn out to be the most interesting.<\/p>\n

The thing I enjoy most about math is seeing surprising connections. That’s what the Atiyah-Singer index theorem and the classification of finite simple groups have in common: they form deep connections. That’s also why I enjoy applied math. I get to see not only connections between areas of math, but also between math and diverse applications.<\/p>\n

RC: <\/strong>What else would you like to share about your blog, your social media accounts or your background?<\/strong><\/p>\n

JDC: If someone would like to find me online, the two best places are by blog (https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/<\/a>) and my Twitter accounts (https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/twitter\/<\/a>).<\/p>\n

I also posed the genie question over email to two other bloggers: Patrick Honner (@MrHonner<\/a>) and John Golden (@mathhombre<\/a>):<\/p>\n

\u201cI would ask the\u00a0genie\u00a0to grant me full understanding of Cauchy’s Integral Theorem,\u201d Honner said. \u201cI’ve always found complex analysis fascinating, and intimidating. I’d love to better understand complex integrability and differentiability, and Cauchy’s Theorem seems like one of those concepts that unlocks a lot of related mathematical understanding. Especially since it’s connected to ideas–like the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and vector analysis–that I know something about,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor me, I think it would be the Atiyah Singer Index Theorem,\u201d Golden said. \u201cI love results that connect fields of mathematics, and this is the beauty of the genre. The connection to the Euler characteristic, the birth of K-theory, the first proof sketched but then changed before publishing \u2026 so many great stories. Plus my advisor instilled a lasting appreciation for Sir MFA\u2019s writing. Though, I think, I migrated from math to teacher education immediately after graduating. With that hat on, I think about \u2026 well, too much. The classification of the platonic solids, the quadratic formula, the fundamental theorem of algebra\u2026 maybe I\u2019d better stick with my mathematician-y answer. And understanding the undecidability of the Continuum Hypothesis!\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

Which theorem would you ask the genie to help you magically, thoroughly understand? Share your responses in the comments below! You can also find me on Twitter @writesRCrowell<\/a>!<\/p>\n

P.S. My answer? I would ask the genie to grant me a thorough understanding of Shinichi Mochizuki\u2019s approximately 550 page proof for the abc conjecture<\/a>, a topic I\u2019ll discuss in my next post later this month. Even though my request is related to a conjecture and not a theorem, I would hope the genie would still grant my wish.<\/p>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cIf a genie offered to give you a thorough understanding of one theorem, what theorem would you choose?\u201d blogger John D. Cook recently asked on his @AnalysisFact Twitter account. Responses ranged from the names of theorems to questions about the … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":143,"featured_media":3733,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[372,86,9,23],"tags":[796,816,815,201,797,814],"class_list":["post-3726","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-math-communication","category-people-in-math","category-recreational-mathematics","category-theoretical-mathematics","tag-applied-math","tag-conjecture","tag-genie","tag-john-d-cook","tag-pure-math","tag-theorem"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2018\/08\/35366549232_d650bc7682_z-300x200-1.jpg?fit=300%2C200&ssl=1","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3tW3N-Y6","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3726","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/143"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3726"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3726\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3736,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3726\/revisions\/3736"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3733"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}