{"id":1675,"date":"2016-01-10T20:30:37","date_gmt":"2016-01-11T02:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/?p=1675"},"modified":"2016-01-11T11:40:40","modified_gmt":"2016-01-11T17:40:40","slug":"todays-post-is-brought-to-you-by-the-letter-p","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2016\/01\/10\/todays-post-is-brought-to-you-by-the-letter-p\/","title":{"rendered":"Today&#8217;s Post Is Brought To You By The Letter P"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There is this joke that people like to make.  It&#8217;s something about how real mathematicians don&#8217;t use numbers.  It&#8217;s a little bit funny, and a lot true.  As a number theorist, I, more so than anybody, should be using numbers, but the truth is that I rarely do.  In my research, almost everything I do is symbolic.  You know, like &#8220;let <em>p<\/em> be a prime,&#8221; or &#8220;&Pi; is an element of the permutation group on <em>p<\/em> many elements&#8221;.  For better or worse, we love to use symbols to simplify the way we communicate math.  <\/p>\n<p>But are we really simplifying things, or just making them a whole lot more confusing? <\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1699\" style=\"width: 160px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2016\/01\/Pi-symbol.svg_.png\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1699\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2016\/01\/Pi-symbol.svg_.png?resize=150%2C150\" alt=\"There&#039;s a patent on &pi;.  That is, &pi; with a period after it, like I just did.  &pi; period.  \" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-1699\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2016\/01\/Pi-symbol.svg_.png?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2016\/01\/Pi-symbol.svg_.png?zoom=2&amp;resize=150%2C150 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2016\/01\/Pi-symbol.svg_.png?zoom=3&amp;resize=150%2C150 450w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1699\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">There&#8217;s a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/notices\/201410\/rnoti-p1224.pdf\">patent<\/a> on &pi;.  That is, &pi; with a period after it, like I just did.  &pi; period.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In the newest episode of the mathematics podcast <em><a href=\"http:\/\/relprime.com\">Relatively Prime<\/a><\/em>, host Samuel Hansen has a conversation with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.josephmazur.com\">Joseph Mazur<\/a>, author of the history of symbols in mathematics, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0691154635\/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0691154635&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=ac0674-20&amp;linkId=6HYKQTH36PLVBLBP\">Enlightening Symbols<\/a>.<\/em>  Hansen and Mazur discuss the relatively recent &#8212; well, bearing in mind that in terms of mathematics the 16th century was just yesterday &#8212; creep of symbols into the mathematical lexicon, and what that means for understanding mathematical ideas.  If the father of algebra, Hansen points out, &#8220;had picked up your algebra textbook, he would have no idea what he was looking at.&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>According to Mazur, &#8220;a symbol is something that is graphic, but is also something that doesn&#8217;t look like the thing it represents.&#8221; Such a distinction is important to make, lest we start thinking that words or even numbers themselves are symbols.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/notices\/201410\/rnoti-p1224.pdf\">The letter &pi;<\/a> (that&#8217;s the lowercase one, not to be confused with the upper case &Pi; in the first paragraph), Mazur says, doesn&#8217;t count as a symbol because the greek &pi; denotes that irrational number 3.14159&#8230; which is just the perimeter of a circle divided by its diameter, and perimeter starts with p, the greek equivalent of p is &pi;&#8230;you get the idea. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure that I totally agree with Mazur&#8217;s definition of what constitutes a symbol.  By his logic &Pi; as an element of the permutation group, isn&#8217;t a symbol since permutation starts with <em>p<\/em>, nor is the &Sigma; for summation, and therefore &int; for integral.  So I&#8217;m going to say that in math, a symbol is any non-number or non-word representing a mathematical idea.  <\/p>\n<p>The good thing is that you can convey a great deal of information very quickly, and to the initiated audience, very little preamble is necessary.  For example, my head nearly exploded when I took my first course in graduate number theory, taught by my advisor, who used the following three versions of the letter <em>p<\/em> all to denote distinct objects.     <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2016\/01\/Screen-Shot-2016-01-10-at-8.29.00-PM.png\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/files\/2016\/01\/Screen-Shot-2016-01-10-at-8.29.00-PM.png?resize=188%2C74\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2016-01-10 at 8.29.00 PM\" width=\"188\" height=\"74\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1680\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>At first I was horrified.  But after a few hours it started to make sense.  You begin by letting <em>p<\/em> be a prime, and then the other two versions of <em>p<\/em> are just describing the way that same <em>p<\/em> looks in a different stage of life.  Without getting too jargony on you, it&#8217;s just like having baby, mama, and grandma <em>p<\/em>, all from the same lineage.    <\/p>\n<p>This of course brings with it a collateral problem of writing these letters on the board, which is tantamount to writing high-speed calligraphy with a dull crayon. I&#8217;ve found that you just sort of find your personal style after awhile, but for those just starting, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/loopspace.mathforge.org\/CountingOnMyFingers\/Calligraphy\/\">Old Pappus&#8217; Book of Mathematical Calligraphy<\/a><\/em> is the ultimate style guide for writing math symbols. <\/p>\n<p>So, are we really simplifying things, or are we just building a big gigantic paywall around mathematics to make everything we do look as scary as possible?  I&#8217;m not sure, because when I write math I&#8217;m certainly happy for the symbols, but when I stare at a page of math I know that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/notices\/201507\/rnoti-p742.pdf\">my eyes always scan for written prose<\/a> first.  What do you think? Let me know <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/extremefriday\">@extremefriday<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is this joke that people like to make. It&#8217;s something about how real mathematicians don&#8217;t use numbers. It&#8217;s a little bit funny, and a lot true. As a number theorist, I, more so than anybody, should be using numbers, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2016\/01\/10\/todays-post-is-brought-to-you-by-the-letter-p\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" data-url=https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/2016\/01\/10\/todays-post-is-brought-to-you-by-the-letter-p\/><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":69,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[372],"tags":[514,513,515],"class_list":["post-1675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math-communication","tag-relatively-prime","tag-samuel-hansen","tag-symbols"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3tW3N-r1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/69"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1675"}],"version-history":[{"count":32,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1675\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1710,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1675\/revisions\/1710"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/blogonmathblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}