{"id":384,"date":"2015-09-02T13:33:07","date_gmt":"2015-09-02T18:33:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/?p=384"},"modified":"2015-09-13T20:36:17","modified_gmt":"2015-09-14T01:36:17","slug":"ron-solomon-reviews-recent-work-on-finite-simple-groups","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/2015\/09\/02\/ron-solomon-reviews-recent-work-on-finite-simple-groups\/","title":{"rendered":"Ron Solomon reviews recent work on finite simple groups"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/author.html?mrauthid=164705\">Ron Solomon<\/a> has been quite involved in the study of\u00a0finite simple groups and their classification. \u00a0He is one of the coauthors of the monumental book series on the subject, which starts with <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1303592\">The Classification of the Finite Simple Groups<\/a><\/em>. \u00a0Now that we have a good classification of these groups, it is possible to look more carefully at their structure. \u00a0Solomon wrote a valuable\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=3298118\">review of a paper by Salarian and Stroth<\/a>\u00a0where they investigate the $p$-local structure of\u00a0finite simple groups. \u00a0The review discusses the work that leads up to the present paper: earlier results\u00a0that make the problem interesting and\u00a0earlier results that make the present paper possible. \u00a0By laying out the context and how\u00a0the present work fits into that context, Solomon gives us a look into how group theorists are obtaining increasingly refined information about the finite simple groups, revealing them to be rich objects of study.\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>For finite groups, there is the notion of a group being of local characteristic $p$\u00a0for some prime, $p$. \u00a0Examples are the simple\u00a0groups of Lie type defined over a finite field of characteristic $p$. \u00a0In this context, unlike in field theory or number theory, definitions using\u00a0$p$ and the word &#8220;local&#8221; usually involve <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/P-group#Application_to_structure_of_a_group\">$p$-subgroups<\/a>. (Remember the Sylow theorems&#8230;) \u00a0The present work is connected to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1994966\">larger project<\/a>, led by Meierfrankenfeld, Stellmacher and Stroth (MSS), to understand the <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local structure of finite simple groups of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> and to classify the finite simple groups of local characteristic 2. \u00a0Solomon gives a quick\u00a0description of that project and tells us how it fits in with other big projects, such as his own with\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/author.html?mrauthid=75490\">Gorenstein<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/author.html?mrauthid=204453\">Lyons<\/a> and that of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/author.html?mrauthid=27630\">Aschbacher<\/a> and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/author.html?mrauthid=164085\">Smith<\/a>. \u00a0 For those of us who are not specialists in finite groups, this review gives a nice taste of the work that is going on in the field. \u00a0It is an eye-opener to see how much is known and how much remains to be done.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=3298118\">MR3298118<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/author.html?mrauthid=844045\">Salarian, M. Reza<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/\/search\/institution.html?code=IR_KHRZU2_M\">(IR-KHRZU2-M)<\/a>; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/author.html?mrauthid=168350\">Stroth, Gernot<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/\/search\/institution.html?code=D_MLU_IM\">(D-MLU-IM)<\/a><br \/>\n<span class=\"title\">Existence of strongly <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-embedded subgroups.<\/span><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/journaldoc.html?cn=Comm_Algebra\"><em>Comm. Algebra<\/em><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publications.html?pg1=ISSI&amp;s1=328472\">43 <\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publications.html?pg1=ISSI&amp;s1=328472\">(2015), <\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publications.html?pg1=ISSI&amp;s1=328472\">no. 3,<\/a> 983\u20131024.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/mscdoc.html?code=20D05,(20D06)\">20D05 (20D06)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Classification of Finite Simple Groups (CFSG) shows that most finite simple groups are groups of Lie type defined over a finite field of characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>, for some prime <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. Each of these simple groups <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is of <span class=\"it\">local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span><\/span>, in the sense that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$C_H(O_p(H))\\le O_p(H)$<\/span> for every <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span> of\u00a0<span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>. (We say that a subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local if <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H = N_G(P)$<\/span> for some non-identity <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$P$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>.) Some sporadic simple groups are also of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> for some prime <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. For example, the Mathieu group, <span class=\"MathTeX\">$M_{24}$<\/span>, is of local characteristic 2. Indeed, many simple groups <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>, such as the alternating groups <span class=\"MathTeX\">${\\rm Alt}(p)$<\/span> and the Monster (for <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p\\in \\{ 41,47,59,71 \\}$<\/span>), are of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> simply because they have self-centralizing Sylow <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroups of order <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. This case may be avoided by assuming that a Sylow <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> lies in more than one maximal <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local subgroup of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>, or by taking <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p = 2$<\/span>. There is an ongoing project, led by U. Meierfrankenfeld, B. Stellmacher and G. Stroth (MSS), to understand the <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local structure of finite simple groups of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> and to classify the finite simple groups of local characteristic 2. This project is described in [U. Meierfrankenfeld, B. Stellmacher and G. Stroth, in <span class=\"it\">Groups, combinatorics &amp; geometry (Durham, 2001)<\/span>, 155\u2013192, World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 2003; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publdoc.html?r=1&amp;pg1=CNO&amp;s1=1994966&amp;loc=fromrevtext\">MR1994966 (2004i:20020)<\/a>].<\/p>\n<p>More recently, attention has been given to an even more ambitious project\u2014the classification of the finite simple groups of <span class=\"it\">parabolic characteristic 2<\/span>. Here, <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is said to be of parabolic characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> if <span class=\"MathTeX\">$C_H(O_p(H))\\le O_p(H)$<\/span> for every <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> which contains a Sylow <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>. Most of the sporadic simple groups are of parabolic characteristic 2, even though most are not of local characteristic 2. For example, the Monster and the Baby Monster are both of parabolic characteristic 2. We remark that the phrase `parabolic characteristic 2&#8242;, as used by MSS, is synonymous with the phrase <span class=\"it\">even characteristic<\/span>, as used by M. G. Aschbacher and S. D. Smith in their monographs proving the Quasithin Theorem [<span class=\"it\">The classification of quasithin groups. I<\/span>, Math. Surveys Monogr., 111, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publdoc.html?r=1&amp;pg1=CNO&amp;s1=2097623&amp;loc=fromrevtext\">MR2097623 (2005m:20038a)<\/a>; <span class=\"it\">The classification of quasithin groups. II<\/span>, Math. Surveys Monogr., 112, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publdoc.html?r=1&amp;pg1=CNO&amp;s1=2097624&amp;loc=fromrevtext\">MR2097624 (2005m:20038b)<\/a>]. There is yet another weakening of the notion of local characteristic 2, called <span class=\"it\">even type<\/span>, which is utilized by D. Gorenstein, R. N. Lyons and R. M. Solomon in their project (GLS) to revise the proof of CFSG, as outlined in Monograph 1 of the GLS project [<span class=\"it\">The classification of the finite simple groups<\/span>, Math. Surveys Monogr., 40.1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publdoc.html?r=1&amp;pg1=CNO&amp;s1=1303592&amp;loc=fromrevtext\">MR1303592 (95m:20014)<\/a>]. Aschbacher and Smith proved in the final chapter of their magnum opus that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}$<\/span>-proper quasithin simple groups of even type are all of even characteristic (parabolic characteristic 2), except for the sporadic Janko group <span class=\"MathTeX\">$J_1$<\/span>. In particular, 11 of the 26 sporadic simple groups are quasithin of parabolic characteristic 2. This result has recently been extended by Magaard and Stroth to an identification of all <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}$<\/span>-proper simple groups of even type which are not of parabolic characteristic 2. I should note that a finite group <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is called <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}$<\/span>-proper if every simple section of every proper subgroup of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is on the list of conclusions of CFSG. Thus, a minimal counterexample to CFSG is <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}$<\/span>-proper, and some version of this hypothesis is used in all current efforts to provide a revised proof of CFSG. In particular, the paper currently under review uses the related notion that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is a <span class=\"it\"><span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}_p$<\/span>-group<\/span> if every simple section of every <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local subgroup of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is a known finite simple group, i.e., appears on the list of conclusions of CFSG. The GLS project proposes to provide a revised treatment of the classification of simple groups, both of even type and of odd (= not even) type, quoting in particular the Aschbacher-Smith monographs for the treatment of quasithin groups of even type. The GLS treatment of the\u00a0<span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}$<\/span>-proper simple groups of odd type will be completed in Monograph 7 of their series, of which six monographs have been published. We may hope that the even type (parabolic characteristic 2) portion of CFSG will in the near future have two largely independent treatments: AS + GLS and MSS.<\/p>\n<p>We turn more specifically to the paper under review and its place in the MSS project. A fundamental role in the authors&#8217; program is played by <span class=\"it\">large subgroups<\/span>. For them, a <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$Q$<\/span> of a group <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is large if<\/p>\n<dl class=\"roster\">\n<dd>(1) \u00a0 \u00a0<span class=\"MathTeX\">$C_G(Q)\\le Q$<\/span>; and<\/dd>\n<dd>(2) \u00a0 \u00a0<span class=\"MathTeX\">$N_G(U)\\le N_G(Q)$<\/span> for all non-identity <span class=\"MathTeX\">$U\\le C_G(Q) = Z(Q)$<\/span>.<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<p>An easy argument shows that the existence of a large subgroup implies that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is of parabolic characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. MSS have proved an important Structure Theorem [<span class=\"it\">The local structure theorem for finite groups with a large <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup<\/span>, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., Amer. Math. Soc., to appear] describing the <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local structure of finite groups <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> having a large <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup. The next step in the program is to identify the subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> generated by certain <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-local overgroups of a fixed Sylow <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$S$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>. In general <span class=\"MathTeX\">$F^*(H)$<\/span> will be a simple group of Lie type in characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> containing <span class=\"MathTeX\">$N_G(X)$<\/span> for all non-identity normal subgroups <span class=\"MathTeX\">$X$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$S$<\/span>. The final step is to prove that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H = G$<\/span>, thereby identifying <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>. The paper under review then completes this final step in the generic case, when <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. Specifically, the authors work under the following Hypothesis 1:<\/p>\n<dl class=\"roster\">\n<dd>(a) There is a subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span> of the finite group <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> such that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$F^*(H) = G(r)$<\/span>, <span class=\"MathTeX\">$r = p^u$<\/span>, is a group of Lie type and rank as a <span class=\"MathTeX\">$BN$<\/span>-pair at least <span class=\"MathTeX\">$2$<\/span>, and at least <span class=\"MathTeX\">$3$\u00a0<\/span>if <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> is odd.<\/dd>\n<dd>(b) If <span class=\"MathTeX\">$S\\in Syl_p(H)$<\/span> and <span class=\"MathTeX\">$1\\ne X\\triangleleft S$<\/span>, then <span class=\"MathTeX\">$N_G(X)\\le H$<\/span>.<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<p>They prove the following two theorems.<br \/>\nTheorem 1. Assume that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> and that Hypothesis 1 holds for <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>. Then <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span> is strongly <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-embedded in <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>, i.e., <span class=\"MathTeX\">$N_G(X)\\le H$\u00a0<\/span>for every non-identity <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup <span class=\"MathTeX\">$X$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span>.<br \/>\nTheorem 2. Assume that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> and that Hypothesis 1 holds for <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>. Then <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G = H$<\/span> if one of the following conditions holds:<\/p>\n<dl class=\"roster\">\n<dd>(1) <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p = 2$<\/span>; or<\/dd>\n<dd>(2) <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> is odd and <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is both a <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}_p$<\/span>-group and a <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}_2$<\/span>-group.<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<p>Note that groups with a proper strongly <span class=\"MathTeX\">$2$<\/span>-embedded subgroup were classified by H. Bender [J. Algebra <span class=\"bf\">17<\/span> (1971), 527\u2013554; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publdoc.html?r=1&amp;pg1=CNO&amp;s1=288172&amp;loc=fromrevtext\">MR0288172 (44 #5370)<\/a>], which is why Theorem 2 follows immediately from Theorem 1 when <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p = 2$<\/span>. For <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> odd, Theorem 2 follows immediately from Theorem 1 and the main theorem of [C. W. Parker and G. Stroth, Pure Appl. Math. Q. <span class=\"bf\">7<\/span> (2011), no. 3, Special Issue: In honor of Jacques Tits, 797\u2013858; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publdoc.html?r=1&amp;pg1=CNO&amp;s1=2848592&amp;loc=fromrevtext\">MR2848592 (2012f:20071)<\/a>]. Also, as noted by the authors, a version of Theorem 2 for <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p = 2$<\/span> has been proved by Aschbacher in [Invent. Math. <span class=\"bf\">180<\/span> (2010), no. 2, 225\u2013299; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publdoc.html?r=1&amp;pg1=CNO&amp;s1=2609243&amp;loc=fromrevtext\">MR2609243 (2011c:20037)<\/a>] without Hypothesis 1(a), but under the hypothesis that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span> is a <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{K}_2$<\/span>-group, which the authors avoid here.<\/p>\n<p>The paper under review uses Aschbacher&#8217;s local <span class=\"MathTeX\">$C(G,T)$<\/span>-Theorem as revised by D. M. Bundy, N. Hebbinghaus and B. Stellmacher [J. Algebra <span class=\"bf\">300<\/span> (2006), no. 2, 741\u2013789; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/mathscinet\/search\/publdoc.html?r=1&amp;pg1=CNO&amp;s1=2228220&amp;loc=fromrevtext\">MR2228220 (2007c:20050)<\/a>], and extended to the class of groups of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. In order to pass from the hypothesis that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$N_G(X)\\le H$<\/span> for all non-identity normal subgroups <span class=\"MathTeX\">$X$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$S$<\/span> to the conclusion that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$N_G(X)\\le H$<\/span> for all non-identity subgroups of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$S$<\/span>, the authors must use the &#8220;pushing-up&#8221; methodology. In particular, they must confront obstructions to pushing-up, dubbed <span class=\"it\">blocks<\/span> by Aschbacher. Here the obstructions studied are in sets <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{P}^*(X)$<\/span>, arising as follows. For <span class=\"MathTeX\">$X$<\/span> a <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroup of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span>, the authors set <span class=\"MathTeX\">$$ \\mathcal{M}(X) = \\{ K : K\\nleq H, O_p(K)\\ne 1, X\\le K \\}. $$<\/span> They define a partial ordering on such subgroups <span class=\"MathTeX\">$K$<\/span> based on containment of Sylow <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-subgroups of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$K\\cap H$<\/span>, and let <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{M}_{\\max}(X)$<\/span> denote the maximal elements under this partial ordering. Then they let <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{P}(X)$<\/span> denote the minimal members of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{M}_{\\max}(X)$<\/span> under inclusion. Finally, they set <span class=\"MathTeX\">$$ \\mathcal{P}^*(X) = \\{ K : K\\in \\mathcal{P}(X), O_{p&#8217;}(K)\\le H, F^*(K\/O_{p&#8217;}(K)) = O_{p&#8217;p}(K)\/O_p(K) \\}. $$<\/span> These are their &#8220;blocks&#8221;, whose structure was determined mainly by [D. M. Bundy, N. Hebbinghaus and B. Stellmacher, op. cit.]. Arguments in Sections 3, 4 and 5 narrow down the possible structures considerably, using Hypothesis 1. Next, letting <span class=\"MathTeX\">$R$\u00a0<\/span>denote a long (short if <span class=\"MathTeX\">$F^*(H)\\cong {\\rm Sp}_{2n}(2^m)$<\/span>) root subgroup of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$F^*(H)$<\/span>, the authors proceed, mostly under the hypothesis (5.1) that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$C_G(t)\\nleq H$\u00a0<\/span>for some non-identity <span class=\"MathTeX\">$t\\in C_H(R)$<\/span> of order <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. The goal is to prove that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$\\mathcal{P}^*(C_S(t)) = \\emptyset$<\/span> for all such <span class=\"MathTeX\">$t$<\/span>. This is achieved in Section 6 for <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p = 2$<\/span>, and in Section 7 for odd <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. However, when <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p = 2$<\/span>, certain possibilities for <span class=\"MathTeX\">$F^*(H)$<\/span> of <span class=\"MathTeX\">$BN$<\/span>-rank 2 were excluded in Hypothesis 4.5. These are handled in Section 8. Finally, a fairly short argument in Section 9 now shows that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$C_G(t)\\le H$<\/span> for all <span class=\"MathTeX\">$t\\in H$<\/span> of order <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>. As <span class=\"MathTeX\">$N_G(S)\\le H$<\/span>, an easy standard argument yields that <span class=\"MathTeX\">$H$<\/span> is strongly <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>-embedded in <span class=\"MathTeX\">$G$<\/span>, as desired.<\/p>\n<p>As noted earlier, this paper is an important component of the endgame for the MSS classification project. With a view to the possible extension of this project to cover groups of parabolic characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span>, the authors avoid the hypothesis of local characteristic <span class=\"MathTeX\">$p$<\/span> until Section 9 of this paper.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ron Solomon has been quite involved in the study of\u00a0finite simple groups and their classification. \u00a0He is one of the coauthors of the monumental book series on the subject, which starts with The Classification of the Finite Simple Groups. \u00a0Now &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/2015\/09\/02\/ron-solomon-reviews-recent-work-on-finite-simple-groups\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" data-url=https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/2015\/09\/02\/ron-solomon-reviews-recent-work-on-finite-simple-groups\/><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-384","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exceptional-reviews"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6C2KK-6c","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=384"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":449,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384\/revisions\/449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=384"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ams.org\/beyondreviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}